Pages

Powered By Blogger

March 17, 2014

LACK OF POLITICAL DECENCY IN INDIAN POLITICS, March 16 - 31 , 2014 , Just In Print




Decency is one of our defining national qualities, but it won't be for much longer if we continue to erode the living standards of people already doing it tough.

More than ever now Indian politics and debate needs standards close to those of advertising. It may be hard for Indian politicians to make statements whose intent is not to malign, but it will certainly generate greater interest in actual politics and governance if the public mention of an opponent or opposing party were to be made illegal. The act of continual accusation has made debate redundant in India. Every minister, MP, or party spokesman who stands in front of the television screen puts up a defense of policy that is an offence against the opposing MP seated in the same debate.
We’ve often heard the phrase ‘physician heal thyself’ meaning that doctors may have the ability to heal sickness in others but may sometimes not be willing to heal themselves. Being proud of his own knowledge and wellbeing, a doctor may ignore sound medical advice and allow his own personal disease to grow. This principle applies to leaders at all levels, especially to modern day politicians in a democratic set up. Some politicians could be nice and gentle but are they effective as National leaders is a million dollar question. They need to take some leadership lessons themselves as they lead a billion plus citizens. Without improving their own inner sense of worth, the leadership of the political class wouldn’t inspire others. As H.L. Mencken, one of the most influential American writers quipped, “looking for an honest politician is like looking for an ethical burglar.”


India, the world’s largest democracy suffers an overdose of populist measures, launched by leaders at the drop of their Gandhian hat. Besides, politicians are often seen to be corrupt, reckless and wash dirty linen in public. At such times, the politics of Manmohan Singh, the Indian Premier was lauded as ‘politics of decency’. His persistent refusal to indulge in war mongering or hurl ill names at his political adversaries has earned him respect and credibility. However BBC correspondent SoutikBiswas reveals this is history; in his recent article on Asia analysis, he reveals Mr. Singh’s government is now charged with graft and inaction. The Economist magazine has also declared, “Mr Singh has plainly run out of steam”.  It’s clear to many that Manmohan Singh’s personal decency is blended with his timidity; his nicety is now unacceptable as a substitute for inaction.  Knowing him to be a puppet in the hands of Mrs Sonia Gandhi, his decency lacks moral integrity and spiritual strength.  Thomas Jefferson’s immortal words ring in my ears, “Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty”.

Like advertising, a code of ethics for public life needs to be duly stated and politicians similarly told to refrain from disparaging comparisons, making no references to political parties other than their own. The American code of political ethics states: "No political representatives can malign the integrity of another on the basis of his or her position by using hostile or demeaning words. A political representative must withdraw him or herself from a position in which competence is lacking. A political representative shall not make any public statement which may be false or with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity."

In retaliation Mani Shankar Aiyar makes a caustic, deliberately insensitive remark about Modi's humble origins, asking how a country like India can ever be ruled by a tea vendor. 

In return, the BJP says: "It's better to sell tea, than sell the country."BJP spokesmen also refer to Rahul Gandhi as Rahul Baba, a reference to his age and inexperience. No mother would want to sacrifice her son on the national altar. Modi launches a scathing attack on Sonia Gandhi's Italian origins; there are countless references to the Congress's foreign connections, Bofors, Quattrocchi, Swiss accounts, notions of dynasty. 

Finance Minister P Chidambaram and other netas have Modi phobia and they need psychoanalysis, said party spokesperson Meenakshi Lekhi. Congress Minister Manish Tewari and Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Sushma Swaraj, too, had a unsavoury exchange on Twitter. The nastiness does not surprise in the atmosphere of lack of mutual respect, and even self-respect. It has become par for the course in our political discourse.

While the West of India is progressing the rest of India is regressing. Modi fills the air waves with innuendo about Congress incompetence. People of India want track record, not tape record. The ugliness of Indian politics is in great part the outcome of negative campaigns, personal barbs and malicious vendettas that have little relevance to governance, but are consistently used to send subversive messages against an opposing individual or party. In a parliamentary system that encourages such destructive exchange, the real ideas of politics get submerged in the muck of words and personal sentiments. Not willing to be left behind, the Aam Aadmi Party too has gotten into the act.

Leaders are expected to be decisive; a leader needs to have his own independent thinking. His being a team player is not proved by his silent confirmation to the’ big boss ’ but rather by his ability to openly share his views with others. He is willing to confront his own team members and challenge the proposals, yet remains loyal and commits to the team’s decision.

A leader’s maturity is seen by his or her willingness to confront when credibility is at stake. Most timid leaders reconcile and compromise on principles just to remain popular or to please some others who may be fulfilling their material needs. The net result of such sycophancy leadership is you land up pleasing none; your friends eventually turn to be your detractors and you cut a sorry figure. Mr Singh’s former media advisor, Harish Khare openly declared, “Manmohan Singh may not be corrupt, but he’s definitely guilty of pursuing a politics of decency and elevating reconciliation to a matter of state policy”.Besides, feeble and vacillating leadership also brings suffering upon the very lives of those you are seeking to serve. That’s what is happening to Manmohan Singh and the Indian people.

“Politics has no relation to morals,” said Machiavelli. While we are endlessly swamped by reports of corruption of our netas, we must place their crooked shenanigans in perspective. Corruption was an integral part of politics in Machiavelli’s age many centuries ago. Our own Chanakya’s Arthashastra noted this fact millennia ago. When leaders and officials are left to manage public money, it is inevitable that they will pocket some of it, just like fish swimming in the sea imbibe some of the water. Meanwhile, only days ago in Uttar Pradesh, minister Shivpal Yadav claims he was mis-quoted telling officials, “If you work hard, you can steal a little.”

Freedom fighter N V Krishnamachari voiced the concerns of many of us in a recent interview. “We might term the British firangis or ‘white men’, but they ruled us based on laws... But what principles do today’s politicians have? Hardly any. We fought to get a nation to be ruled by Indians based on truth, ahimsa, human values... (But) the British did not trouble the public as much as our elected politicians do now.” The proof of his rueful words lies all around us. 

It's often said that freedom and responsibility are two sides of the same coin that if you want freedom, you must first accept the responsibility that goes with it.The truth is simpler. Freedom and responsibility aren't interconnected things. They are the same thing. Freedom is responsibility. Responsibility is experiencing the consequences of your own acts not the consequences of others acts or making others pay for what you do.

And that's what freedom is. Without government to force others to pay for your pleasures or mistakes, and without forcing you to pay for what others do, you are a free, responsible human being. We have to decide whether we want a nation of self-reliant individuals who improve their own lives by offering needed services to others or a nation in which everyone is responsible for everyone else and so the government must control every aspect of our lives. We don't need a moral revival, we don't need politicians making moral decisions for us, and we don't need more controls. If we want people to act more responsibly.There are plenty of people who won't act responsibly. There are people who have no regard for the consequences of their own acts. There are people who seem incapable of behaving wisely or nicely.

Meaningless shouting, sloganeering and protesting are futile efforts to express dissent. Today's youth is a beautiful concoction of good, creative minds with great insights. So why not choose creative means of expression as the key mantra?
Very often, the youth is misled and provided a wrong perspective. The confusion that leads them in a state of aggression must be addressed. Nobody is born corrupt, they learn it from their elders. Meaningless shouting, sloganeering and protesting is not the right way. The youth consists of good,creative people with marvellous brains, which is going to waste. The effort should be to provide them creative means of expression. One must take an individual stand and never indulge oneself into mindless protest. There are better options also.

Indians may call itself a "democracy" but it is only in name. And we are forgetting the key element to any functioning democracy, a free press that properly informs its citizenry. We have had neither for a long, long time.

Do we really want a society where we erode the living standards of people already doing it tough? Where we make it harder for people on a basic wage to put money away for their retirement? Are we really content to be fed a diet of misrepresentations, lies and half-truths about these matters, whether from politicians or a compliant press? I suspect most Indians would answer these questions in the negative. That being the case, we need to be vocal about the kind of decent society we aspire to, rather than sleepwalking into a society we don't recognise as ours.
Siddhartha shankar Mishra,

Sambalpur, Odisha

No comments: